The motion to reinstate the Monaro Rail Trail project into the Snowy Monaro Regional Council’s delivery and operational plan has been passed, but not before sparking intense debate among councillors, reflecting a mix of enthusiasm for potential economic rejuvenation and caution over possible risks and costs.
PHOTO: A section of rail line on the proposed route in Tuggeranong CREDIT: Monaro Rail Trail (MRT).
Councillor Davis, a chief advocate for the project, underscored its significance during the recent council meeting. She argued that the motion focused on completing a critical business case to assess the feasibility of the rail trail stretching from Michelago to Bombala.
“This motion is about getting this project back into the delivery and operational plan,” she stated, emphasising the necessity of this step for informed decision-making. She added, “We’ve spent half a million dollars on reports to build the business case, and without completing this process, we can’t even justify the expenditure.”
The Monaro Rail Trail proposal envisions converting the old Queanbeyan to Bombala railway into a 213-kilometre recreational trail for cyclists and walkers, potentially spurring tourism and economic growth in the region.
PHOTO: The proposed rail trail would travel through regional towns from Queanbeyan to Bombala CREDIT: MRT.
According to Monaro Rail Trail Inc., this initiative aims to elevate local economies by attracting visitors, similar to New Zealand’s Otago Rail Trail, which significantly contributed to its regional economy.
However, not all councillors share Councillor Davis’s optimism. Councillor Thaler criticised the proposal, suggesting that the council’s resources would be better utilised addressing fundamental infrastructure needs. “I would rather put our efforts into more urgent priorities,” Thaler expressed, highlighting concerns over diverting resources away from essential services.
Councillor Rose echoed these reservations, voicing concerns about potential environmental issues and hidden costs in regards to the potential presence of heavy metals and asbestos under railway lines in the region.
In support of Rose’s cautionary perspective, the Cooma Monaro Progress Association released a press statement detailing environmental and financial ramifications. Ian Ware, representing the association, expressed apprehension over maintenance costs and ecological impact, calling for alternative proposals.
PHOTO: Track work near Cooma CREDIT: Cooma Monaro Railway Inc. (CMR)
Councillor Stewart backed the motion, advocating for the potential benefits to the local economy and tourism. “A lot of rail trails have tried to be the boost to help battling communities,” Stewart argued, claiming significant local support in the Nimmitabel-Bombala area. Stewart further pointed out the potential for long-term economic opportunities, particularly for younger residents seeking economic stability in the region.
Councillor Higgins called for a forward-thinking approach, recognising the rail trail as a pivotal opportunity for economic diversification and community enrichment. “We’ve spoken about this ad nauseam, about the smaller towns needing an economic boost,” she argued. Emphasising the project’s potential to foster a vibrant future for the Snowy Monaro region, Councillor Higgins advocated for the project progressing beyond stagnation, and to watch closely Queanbeyan Palerang Regional Council’s progress on their rail trail during the period of the performance improvement order.
PHOTO: Cooma Railway Station on CMR Artisan Market day CREDIT: CMR.
Despite these divergent views, the conversation continues to pivot on weighing potential economic gains against environmental and fiscal prudence. The outcome of this debate remains pivotal for the council as it considers the implications for its operational strategies as well as community welfare. Ultimately, whether the Monaro rail trail project proceeds hinges on balancing visionary aspirations with pragmatic considerations.